What Kleinman did with the evidence he had unearthed is also interesting:
I came across that, and I was stunned … I was directed to write a report … and I described in great detail what happened and why those were violations of the Geneva Convention. But I was directed to send my report up my chain of command … and I was ordered to keep it within those channels — for classification, for security purposes … So I did everything, even beyond what was reasonable. I did make my chain of command very clear. I did make the Department of Defense inspector general's office aware. It was classified. Had I spoken out at that time … I could have been charged with divulging classified information.In addition to the peer pressure (and veiled threats), therefore, there was the silence and inertia of his hiearchy, and the possibility of prosecutions being used against him. One can only wonder, in the present context, what the legal implications might be for the "chain of command". If ever there was a case of "knew or should have known and failed to take measures to prevent", this must surely be it. Although his initiative was unsuccesful in this case, it is comfort to see that some senior officers had the integrity and the courage to stand up against what they witnessed, and always a helpful reminder that this is an option in spite of the reactions.
No comments:
Post a Comment